Re: PostgresSQL and HIPAA compliance
От | Mike Sofen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgresSQL and HIPAA compliance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 052301d1c8c3$a5868710$f0939530$@runbox.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgresSQL and HIPAA compliance (Alex John <alex.john@holmusk.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
-----Original Message----- From: Alex John Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 3:04 AM To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: [GENERAL] PostgresSQL and HIPAA compliance Hello, I have a few questions regarding the use of PostgreSQL and HIPAA compliance. I work for a company that plans on storing protected health information (PHI) on our servers. We have looked at various solutions for doing so, and RDS is a prime candidate except for the fact that they have explicitly stated that the Postgres engine is *not* HIPAA compliant. Users on the IRC channel generally say that the guidelines are more catered towards building better firewalls and a sane access policy, but I would like to know if there is anything within the implementation of Postgres itself that violates said compliance. If anyone works at a similar company and utilizes postgresql to store PHI, please let me know. Thank you, Alex --------------------------------------------------------------------- HIPAA compliance does not specify (ever) the technical solution to meet the requirements, so ANY datastore that can be properly managed within the context of HIPAA compliance is legal and allowed. Ignore IRCs and search on securing PHI on relational databases, you'll find lots of details around data access roles, documentation, processes, data obfuscation, etc. Mike
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: