Re: [HACKERS] index-only count(*) for indexes supporting bitmap scans

> I've pushed the executor part of this, but mostly not the planner part,
> because I didn't think the latter was anywhere near ready for prime
> time: the regression test changes it was causing were entirely bogus.
>
Hi Tom,

Thanks for the commit and the explanation. I'll try to address your 
comments if I continue working on the planner part.

-- 

Alexander Kuzmenkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers