Re: Foreign Key Deadlocking

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Cramer
Тема Re: Foreign Key Deadlocking
Дата
Msg-id 049552E8-8EBB-4B44-8D65-6108456A2421@fastcrypt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Foreign Key Deadlocking  (Csaba Nagy <nagy@ecircle-ag.com>)
Ответы Re: Foreign Key Deadlocking  (Erik Jones <erik@myemma.com>)
Re: Foreign Key Deadlocking  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Hi Csaba,

I have a similar problem.

In an attempt to avoid the overhead of select count(*) from mailbox
where uid = somuid I've implemented triggers on insert and delete.

So there is a

user table which refers to to an inbox table,

so when people insert into the inbox there is an RI trigger grabbing
the shared lock, then the count triggers try to grab an exclusive
lock resulting in a deadlock.

Can we safely remove the shared locks ?

Is there a right way to implement the count triggers. I've tried
before triggers, and after triggers, both result in different kinds
of deadlocks.

Dave
On 18-Apr-07, at 11:36 AM, Csaba Nagy wrote:

>> Can someone confirm that I've identified the right fix?
>
> I'm pretty sure that won't help you... see:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-12/msg00029.php
>
> The deadlock will be there if you update/insert the child table and
> update/insert the parent table in the same transaction (even if you
> update some other field on the parent table than the key referenced by
> the child table). If your transactions always update/insert only
> one of
> those tables, it won't deadlock (assuming you order the inserts/
> updates
> properly per PK).
>
> Cheers,
> Csaba.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Merlin Moncure"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
Следующее
От: Erik Jones
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Foreign Key Deadlocking