Re: SQL-standard function body
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SQL-standard function body |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 04907e73-5de0-d144-9377-3f61c24fe2b9@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | SQL-standard function body (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SQL-standard function body
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-06-30 19:49, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > This adds support for writing CREATE FUNCTION and CREATE PROCEDURE > statements for language SQL with a function body that conforms to the > SQL standard and is portable to other implementations. Here is a new patch. The only significant change is that pg_dump support is now fixed. Per the discussion in [0], I have introduced a new function pg_get_function_sqlbody() that just produces the formatted SQL body, not the whole function definition. All the tests now pass. As mentioned before, more tests are probably needed, so if reviewers just want to play with this and find things that don't work, those could be put into test cases, for example. As a thought, a couple of things could probably be separated from this patch and considered separately: 1. making LANGUAGE SQL the default 2. the RETURN statement If reviewers think that would be sensible, I can prepare separate patches for those. [0]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/9df8a3d3-13d2-116d-26ab-6a273c1ed38c%402ndquadrant.com -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: