Re: [PATCH] Added TRANSFORM FOR for COMMENT tab completion
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Added TRANSFORM FOR for COMMENT tab completion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 047d4744-3290-5ea4-685a-ab4882a5290b@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Added TRANSFORM FOR for COMMENT tab completion (Shinya Kato <Shinya11.Kato@oss.nttdata.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Added TRANSFORM FOR for COMMENT tab completion
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021/10/27 15:54, Shinya Kato wrote: > On 2021-10-27 14:45, Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 05:04:24PM +0900, Shinya Kato wrote: >>> Barring any objection, I will change status to Ready for Committer. >> >> + else if (Matches("COMMENT", "ON", "PROCEDURAL")) >> + COMPLETE_WITH("LANGUAGE"); >> + else if (Matches("COMMENT", "ON", "PROCEDURAL", "LANGUAGE")) >> + COMPLETE_WITH_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_languages); >> I don't think that there is much point in being this picky either with >> the usage of PROCEDURAL, as we already complete a similar and simpler >> grammar with LANGUAGE. I would just remove this part of the patch. > In my opinion, it is written in the documentation, so tab-completion of "PROCEDURAL"is good. > How about a completion with "LANGUAGE" and "PROCEDURAL LANGUAGE", like "PASSWORD" and "ENCRYPTED PASSWORD" in CREATE ROLE? > >> + else if (Matches("COMMENT", "ON", "OPERATOR")) >> + COMPLETE_WITH("CLASS", "FAMILY"); >> Isn't this one wrong? Operators can have comments, and we'd miss >> them. This is mentioned upthread, but it seems to me that we'd better >> drop this part of the patch if the operator naming part cannot be >> solved easily. > As you said, it may be misleading. > I agree to drop it. So I changed the status of the patch to Waiting on Author in CF. +static const SchemaQuery Query_for_list_of_text_search_configurations = { We already have Query_for_list_of_ts_configurations in tab-complete.c. Do we really need both queries? Or we can drop either of them? +#define Query_for_list_of_operator_class_index_methods \ +"SELECT pg_catalog.quote_ident(amname)"\ +" FROM pg_catalog.pg_am"\ +" WHERE (%d = pg_catalog.length('%s'))"\ +" AND oid IN "\ +" (SELECT opcmethod FROM pg_catalog.pg_opclass "\ +" WHERE pg_catalog.quote_ident(opcname)='%s')" Isn't it overkill to tab-complete this? I thought that because I'm not sure if COMMENT command for OPERATOR CLASS or FAMILY is usually executed via psql interactively, instead I just guess it's executed via script. Also because there is no tab-completion support for ALTER OPERATOR CLASS or FAMILY command. It's a bit strange to support the tab-complete for COMMENT for OPERATOR CLASS or FAMILY first. Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: