Re: pg_log_backend_memory_contexts() and log level
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_log_backend_memory_contexts() and log level |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 04596d19-1bb6-4865-391d-4e63c9b3317f@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_log_backend_memory_contexts() and log level (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022/01/26 14:27, Bharath Rupireddy wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:46 AM Bharath Rupireddy > <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 9:48 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> pg_log_backend_memory_contexts() should be designed not to send the messages about the memory contexts to the clientregardless of client_min_messages. But I found that the message "logging memory contexts of PID %d" can be sent tothe client because it's ereport()'d with LOG level instead of LOG_SERVER_ONLY. Is this a bug, and shouldn't we use LOG_SERVER_ONLYlevel to log that message? Patch attached. >> >> +1. The patch LGTM. Thanks for the review! > While we are here, I think it's enough to have the > has_function_privilege, not needed to set role regress_log_memory and > then execute the function as we already have code covering the > function above (SELECT > pg_log_backend_memory_contexts(pg_backend_pid());). Thought? > > SELECT has_function_privilege('regress_log_memory', > 'pg_log_backend_memory_contexts(integer)', 'EXECUTE'); -- yes > > SET ROLE regress_log_memory; > SELECT pg_log_backend_memory_contexts(pg_backend_pid()); > RESET ROLE; Or it's enough to set role and execute the function? Either those or has_function_privilege() can be removed from the test,but I don't have strong reason to do that for now... Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: