Re: Doc: Fixed the result of the bit_count example
От | Daniel Gustafsson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Doc: Fixed the result of the bit_count example |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 04205623-A800-42E9-A52C-EB0DE2F963CE@yesql.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Doc: Fixed the result of the bit_count example ("wangzk.fnstxz@fujitsu.com" <wangzk.fnstxz@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Doc: Fixed the result of the bit_count example
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On 29 Jul 2021, at 11:23, wangzk.fnstxz@fujitsu.com wrote: > > Hello: > > There is a small problem with the documentation for the previously added SQL function “bit_count”. > > In the doc, (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/functions-binarystring.html) > “bit_count('\x1234567890'::bytea)” result is "31" , but the actual result is "15". > > Similar problems have been fixed in test file (commit: ebedd0c78fc51c293abe56e99a18c67af14da0c9), but the doc has notbeen modified. Good catch, with the default value of standard_conforming_strings the result is indeed 15 and should be updated to reflect that. I'll apply this shortly backpatched to 14 where bit_count was introduced. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: