Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? )
От | Mitch Vincent |
---|---|
Тема | Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 041101bfb5f2$4e9899c0$4100000a@venux.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) ("Mitch Vincent" <mitch@huntsvilleal.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Production 10k, development 7.2k RPM :-) - Mitch ----- Original Message ----- From: Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com> To: Ross J. Reedstrom <reedstrm@wallace.ece.rice.edu>; Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 1:11 PM Subject: Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Why Not MySQL? ) > At 11:03 AM 5/4/00 -0500, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote: > > >So, 6.5.3 is running on Ultra 160 drives, with the controller throttled to > >80 MB/s, and 7.0 is running on Ultra 2 drives, which also has a controller > >maximum of 80 MB/s. However, the sustained transfer speed of the drives > >themselves are what should be limiting: if they're all relatively modern > >drives, 20MB/s is typical, so neither config will max out the controller. > >(2 drives each, right?) > > Not to mention that seek times make it very difficult to max out > a controller even if theoretically possible with four drives, unless > you're striping and doing large transfers or lookaheads, etc. > > If one's got 10K drives and the other 7.2K drives, you'll certainly > see a difference in transfer rate and seek time. > > So ... what are the disk configurations? > > > > - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> > Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest > Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at > http://donb.photo.net. >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: