Re: surrogate key or not?
| От | Kenneth Gonsalves |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: surrogate key or not? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 0408070930300J.01190@thenilgiris.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: surrogate key or not? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: surrogate key or not?
|
| Список | pgsql-sql |
On Saturday 07 August 2004 04:12 am, Josh Berkus wrote: > > > Meanwhile, every other aspect of the data can change (e.g. a person can > > change his name, sex, age, email, address, even date & place of birth). > > Not to mention data entry mistakes. So it's impossible to use any > > "real"/natural key in this case. > > Absolutely false. It's quite possible, it's just a > performance/schema/data management issue. This also applies to my comment > above. why shouldnt the primary key change? the only key that should never change is a key that is used as a foreign key in another table. In a table like this: id serial unique name varchar primary key name may change - id will never change. id is used as the foreign key -- regards kg http://www.onlineindianhotels.net - fastest hotel search website in the world http://www.ootygolfclub.org
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: