Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE

On 2017/02/22 21:24, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>> +       /*
>> +        * Unlike inheritance children, partition tables are expected to be dropped
>> +        * when the parent partitioned table gets dropped.
>> +        */
>>
>> Hmm.  Partitions *are* inheritance children, so we perhaps don't need the
>> part before the comma.  Also, adding "automatically" somewhere in there
>> would be nice.
>>
>> Or, one could just write: /* add an auto dependency for partitions */
> 
> I changed it in the attached patch to
> +    /*
> +     * Partition tables are expected to be dropped when the parent partitioned
> +     * table gets dropped.
> +     */

OK, thanks.

Thanks,
Amit