Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows

On 07/27/2017 04:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> How about we fix it like this?
> That seems pretty invasive; I'm not excited about breaking a lot of
> unrelated code (particularly third-party extensions) for plperl's benefit.
> Even if we wanted to do that in HEAD, it seems like a nonstarter for
> released branches.
>
> An even bigger issue is that if Perl feels free to redefine sigsetjmp,
> what other libc calls might they decide to horn in on?
>
> So I was trying to figure a way to not include XSUB.h except in a very
> limited part of plperl, like ideally just the .xs files.  It's looking
> like that would take nontrivial refactoring though :-(.  Another problem
> is that this critical bit of the library API is in XSUB.h:
>
> #if defined(PERL_IMPLICIT_CONTEXT) && !defined(PERL_NO_GET_CONTEXT) && !defined(PERL_CORE)
> #  undef aTHX
> #  undef aTHX_
> #  define aTHX        PERL_GET_THX
> #  define aTHX_        aTHX,
> #endif
>
> As best I can tell, that's absolute brain death on the part of the Perl
> crew; it means you can't write working calling code at all without
> including XSUB.h, or at least copying-and-pasting this bit out of it.
>
>             

That's the sort of thing that prompted me to ask what was the minimal
set of defines required to fix the original problem (assuming such a
thing exists)

We haven't used PERL_IMPLICIT_CONTEXT to date, and without ill effect.
For example. it's in the ExtUtils::Embed::ccopts for the perl that
jacana and bowerbird happily build and test against.

cheers

andrew


-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services