Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F44D@mail.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration
|
Список | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh@agliodbs.com] > Sent: 20 February 2004 19:25 > To: PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] GForge WAS: Feeds Integration > > Dave, Hi Josh, > > What's come up recently? I don't remember seeing anything. > > It wasn't on public lists, mostly. Let's just say that a > few people are > *very* dissatisfied with GBorg and might like to try > something else. Also, > we've been discussing having a bug tracking utility for the > main project, particularly for the 7.5 release. That one's been going on on and off for years! Still, I don't think it would be a bad idea. Even Linux has proper bug tracking these days. > HOWEVER, this is all hypothetical. I need to poll this > list and Hackers > first and get a vote from people, as well as having an > organized proposal -- which is going to wait until we have a > blank GForge up and running on Hub.org > first. So let's postpone the rest of the discussion until > that happens, > hey? Well, hang on. Why Gforge? Are there other solutions? If so then I think any voting/discussions/whatever should include the choice of new platform. It's also normal to have the discussion before a vote rather than the other way round as you are proposing (unless I misunderstand what you've written), so that people can make a properly informed vote. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: