Re: ODBC problem/question
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ODBC problem/question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8845A@mail.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | ODBC problem/question (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Meskes [mailto:meskes@postgresql.org] > Sent: 10 September 2002 20:42 > To: PostgreSQL Interfaces; PostgreSQL Hacker > Subject: [HACKERS] ODBC problem/question > > > Hi, > > I was just contacted by a customer about the > SQLProcedureColumns call in our odbc driver. It appears this > call is undefined in the standard odbc driver but is > available in odbcplus. Could anyone please enlighten me why > this was forked and not merged into one driver? Is there a > problem when I take the odbcplus code and put it into the > odbc driver? Hi Michael, There are currently 3 variants of the driver. PostgreSQL - This is the current ODBC 2.5 compliant driver. PostgreSQL+ - This is a development version that is ODBC 3.0 compliant. PostgreSQL+ Unicode - This is PostgreSQL+ with Unicode support. We are aiming for PostgreSQL+ Unicode to be the only driver as soon as possible, but due to the way ODBC3 and Unicode support were added (ie. quickly, to solve immediate problems), we (Hiroshi & I) felt it was best to keep them seperate until we were sure of their reliability. Currently, PostgreSQL+ seems pretty good as, does the Unicode version, though that is still missing some features iirc. HTH, Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: