Re: PITR Dead horse?
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PITR Dead horse? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B872071C@mail.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PITR Dead horse? (Austin Gonyou <austin@coremetrics.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PITR Dead horse?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Nicolai Tufar [mailto:ntufar@pisem.net] > Sent: 05 February 2004 00:01 > To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse? > > Totally agree. Robustness and rock-solidness are the only > things missing for PostgreSQL to become the killer of certain > commercial enterprise databases out there. Well I've only been using PostgreSQL since 1997 and the *only* release I ever had problems with was 6.3.2. We also use(d) Informix SE, DB2, Unidata and SQL Server and only Informix and Unidata come close to the robustness of PostgreSQL - and they're not the ones we need to worry about. Now I'm not saying we shouldn't be continually looking to improve things, but I don't think this is quite the problem you imply. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: