Re: gforge
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: gforge |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B87200B0@mail.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | gforge ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: gforge
Re: gforge |
Список | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy@postgresql.org] > Sent: 26 November 2003 15:44 > To: Dave Page > Cc: petere@postgresql.org; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: RE: [pgsql-www] gforge > > > > Based on teh documentation, you can enable/disable: > > Mailing aLists > Surveys ... Globally, or each project manager can do this for his own project (if the latter, then that would address my major concern with the packages capabilities). > > As for what exactly is wrong with gBorg ... again, I don't > know, as I don't use it ... but, as an example, why doesn't > PgAdmin3 use it, except as a redirect to http://www.pgadmin.org? Mainly because we prefer the traditional mailing lists + CVS approach like the core server uses. We also have a multilanguage website that gborg can't do, but then I'm not sure that sf.net can either (for example). Probably better people to ask would be Robert or Chris K-L, as they actively chose sf.net as an alternative to GBorg. > Again, note, I'm neither here nor there on this ... it was > suggested, so I started to play with it to see what it could > do ... if its just a matter of taking cues from gForge and > bring them to gBorg, that's cool too ... My major concern is the confusion that 2 parallel project sites will bring, or the chaos that an attempted migration is likely to cause. I don't see an easy win that won't take significant planning. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: