Re: SQLProcedureColumns
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SQLProcedureColumns |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B86815@mail.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Sebastian Hetze [mailto:s.hetze@linux-ag.de] > Sent: 16 September 2002 06:54 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org; michael.meskes@credativ.de > Subject: SQLProcedureColumns > > > Hi *, > > after spending several hours to get some basic functionality > for the ODBC SQLProcedureColumns call working, I see why we > don't have it yet ;-) > > Currently, only a very limited range of information about > arguments and return values of PostgreSQL database functions > are available from pg_proc: the basic type and the order of > the arguments. Other important properties like precision, > length, default values or even descriptive names for the > arguments are missing. Things are getting even more > complicated since pg_proc is not in the first normalized form. > > To get most out of the ODBC capabilities and because I think > it will be a useful feature for other interface and > application developers out there, I suggest to introduce a > new system table, lets say pg_procattr to hold all the > relevant information. For the beginning, I would be willing > to just fill in the data by hand. Later on I suggest to > extend the CREATE FUNCTION call to manage the basic things > automaticaly. > > As a first shot into the blue my suggestion for the table structure: > > CREATE TABLE pg_procattr ( > attrelid oid, -- OID of the pg_proc entry > attname name, > attclass int2, -- SQL_PARAM_INPUT, SQL_RESUL_COL etc. > atttypid oid, -- this should replace the > oidvector thing > attlen int2, > atttypmod int4, > attnotnull bool, > atthasdef bool, > ordinal int4, > remarks varchar > ) > > This structure is very similar to pg_attribute, so if we dont > break integrity here we could as well use the existing table > and add a column for the attribute 'direction' class. Adding > a column for descriptive remarks for each column would not be > too bad for ordinary table columns anyway... > > Let me know what you think before I start coding. I think you should post to pgsql-hackers explaining the problem and proposed solution. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: