Re: wxWindows Build
| От | Dave Page |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: wxWindows Build |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B844B151@mail.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | wxWindows Build (fmonkey@fmonkey.net) |
| Ответы |
Re: wxWindows Build
|
| Список | pgadmin-hackers |
-----Original Message-----Dave Page wrote:
From: Adam H. Pendleton [mailto:fmonkey@fmonkey.net]
Sent: 26 June 2003 16:04
To: Dave Page
Cc: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows Build
Yeuch. Have we completely removed the 2.4 target now? How about the Mac port is non-Unicode only for now?
Regards, Dave.
Not sure what you mean here. Do you mean can we stil use wxMac 2.4? I have no idea; I don't know why the requirement for wxWindows 2.5 exists. I always assumed pgAdmin3 used some feature of wxWindows that required 2.5. If that's not the case, I will happily move back to 2.4. If Unicode support is the only reason to use 2.5, then sure, we can support a non-Unicode Mac version, for know. Whatever the solution, let me know what you decide. Right now I am trying to solve the QB and Mac problems, so that we can have them ready when we release.
Hi Adam,
As far as I am aware it is just the Unicode support that we use 2.5 for. BTW, when I can persuade it to install, I should have a FreeBSD 5.1 box to play with - albeit a pretty slow one!
Regards, Dave
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: