Re: PostgreSQL 7.3/RH 9/PGAdmin Not a good combo?
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL 7.3/RH 9/PGAdmin Not a good combo? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8259EF5@mail.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL 7.3/RH 9/PGAdmin Not a good combo? (Jim Hines <jhines@wdtv.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL 7.3/RH 9/PGAdmin Not a good combo?
|
Список | pgadmin-support |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Hines [mailto:jhines@wdtv.com] > Sent: 03 April 2003 20:05 > To: Dave Page; pgadmin-support@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] PostgreSQL 7.3/RH 9/PGAdmin > Not a good combo? > > > On Thursday 03 April 2003 01:47 pm, Dave Page wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > > > This is a bug caused by a very long string in the RedHat build of > > PostgreSQL that overflows a buff in the ODBC driver. > > > > Please try the snapshot driver from > > http://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/ > > If I would remove the Redhat build and put in the RPMs from > the Postgresql.org > site, would that fix this issue as well? Depends if they were built on Redhat 9 because the error comes from the long gcc version string that PostgreSQL includes in it's version string. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: