Re: Win32 Powerfail testing
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Win32 Powerfail testing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8259D27@mail.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Win32 Powerfail testing (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Win32 Powerfail testing
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:t-ishii@sra.co.jp] > Sent: 07 March 2003 01:33 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 Powerfail testing > > > > > As I said in the previlus mails, open()+_commit() does the > > > right job with the transaction log files. So probably I think > > > I should stick with open()+_commit() approach for ordinary > > > table/index files too. > > > > Oh, I didn't see that message. So it's either: > > > > open() + _commit() > > Sorry, I did not mention it explicitly. I meant we use the > same implementation as Jan's work. He uses open()+_commit(), > I believe. Ah, but Jan/Katie's code *did not* survive the powerfails. Is there a relatively easy way we can test open()/_commit against CreateFile()/FlushFileBuffers() with the FILE_FLAG_WRITE_THROUGH flag as suggested by Magnus (and indirectly by Merlin I guess)? Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: