Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8259B72@mail.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] > Sent: 29 January 2003 16:57 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Vince Vielhaber; Katie Ward; Curtis Faith; > pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System > > > "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes: > > I'll admit my methods were not particularly scientific, but > over the > > last few weeks I've had far more grief from DB2 and SQL > Server than I > > did from the PostgreSQL native betas. > > My gripe had to do with questioning the reliability of the > platform, not of the Postgres port ;-). > > Aside from load testing as suggested by Vince, I'd be > interested to hear what happens when you pull the power cord > under load (repeatedly). This would give some evidence about > the robustness of the Windows filesystem and its ability to > emulate Unix sync semantics. OK, I can maybe do some testing on that next week (I'm off for a few days from today). Is there anything in particular I should look out for, or that you would want tested? Katie, can I get the latest build from anywhere? Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: