Re: Upgrading rant.
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Upgrading rant. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8128E21@mail.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Upgrading rant. (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: mlw [mailto:pgsql@mohawksoft.com] > Sent: 05 January 2003 16:36 > To: Bruce Momjian > Cc: Tom Lane; Hannu Krosing; Lamar Owen; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upgrading rant. > > (2) Upgrade HAS HAS HAS to be fool proof. Agreed. > No one is going to use it if you say, backup your data just > in case. I think we would be irresponsible to _not_ say that, no matter how good we thought the code was. > It > should be as trust worthy as postgresql itself. If it can't > be that it > is not a valid tool. Anything less will not be used by > professionals and > wouldn't be worth the effort. Agreed again. But I still backup my PostgreSQL boxes, and would advise anyone else to as well. Frankly I'm glad I do, especially having had yet another Fujitsu disk die the other day. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: