Re: /contrib/retep to gborg
| От | Dave Page |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: /contrib/retep to gborg |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8128B08@mail.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | /contrib/retep to gborg (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: /contrib/retep to gborg
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] > Sent: 19 October 2002 17:17 > To: Bruce Momjian > Cc: PostgreSQL-development > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] /contrib/retep to gborg > > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > I am concerned that removing them may cause instability, > particularly > > in some of the java build scripts. That's why I am suggesting not > > doing it during beta. > > Actually, it looks to me like they belong with the JDBC > driver. As long as JDBC is in the main distro, I think we > should leave contrib/retep there too. > > There was some talk of moving JDBC to gborg, but I'm not sure > what the plan is, if any. Marc asked me to sort it along with some other things, but when I spoke to Barry he didn't want to move. I passed it back to Marc. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: