On 1/17/22, 5:24 PM, "Michael Paquier" <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:19:41AM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
>> Given that the code has remained unchanged since the function was
>> introduced in 9.5, it seems reasonable to change the documentation
>> to match the function behaviour rather than the other way round.
>
> Obviously. I'll go fix that as you suggest, if there are no
> objections.
+1
Nathan