RE: BUG #16645: pg_upgrade does not mark template1 as a system database
От | Y. NAKAGAWA |
---|---|
Тема | RE: BUG #16645: pg_upgrade does not mark template1 as a system database |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 029201d696df$c1542940$43fc7bc0$@goodf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #16645: pg_upgrade does not mark template1 as a system database (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
RE: BUG #16645: pg_upgrade does not mark template1 as a system database
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Thank you for your suggestion. According to pgAdmin4, [System database?] is [No] and [Template?] is [Yes]. I will post this to the pgadmin lists later. Regards, -- Nakagawa, Y. -----Original Message----- From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 11:46 AM To: nakagawa@goodf.co.jp Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #16645: pg_upgrade does not mark template1 as a system database PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: > 4. Open pgAdmin 4, connect to the PostgreSQL 13.0 server and expand > the Databases node. > Expected result: > The node has [postgres]. > Actual result: > The node has [postgres] and [template1]. There's no particular concept of a "system database" in Postgres, so I don't know what pgadmin is doing to decide which databases to show or not show, but evidently it's not too well thought out. (The closest concept I can think of is whether a DB is marked datistemplate, but a test confirms that pg_upgrade successfully preserves that property on template0 and template1.) I'd suggest you file this complaint on the pgadmin lists. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: