Re: Is PostgreSQL as an NT Service the next level?
От | Russell Black |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is PostgreSQL as an NT Service the next level? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 028301c11b79$2e14ea80$2f64a8c0@iarchives.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Is PostgreSQL as an NT Service the next level? ("Robby Slaughter" <webmaster@robbyslaughter.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: Is PostgreSQL as an NT Service the next level?
|
Список | pgsql-cygwin |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Robby Slaughter" <webmaster@robbyslaughter.com> Cc: "Pgsql-Cygwin" <pgsql-cygwin@postgresql.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 3:41 PM Subject: [CYGWIN] Is PostgreSQL as an NT Service the next level? > Cygwin folks: It does work---I can execute queries against it and > am even using some PG/plSQL stored procedures. But it gets slow, > even with regular vacumming, and more importantly, after a while > literally dozens of "postgresql.exe" processes appear in the > Task Manager, bogging down the system until I have to kill all > the processes and restart the database. As I understand it, there is postgres.exe process per connection. Perhaps you could reduce the dozens of of processes by doing some connection pooling. I'm using postgresql as the db for a J2EE app on 2000. My J2EE platform does connection pooling for me and I never get more than 4 postgres.exe processes. Also, what kind of "vacuuming" do you do? Just curious. Russell
В списке pgsql-cygwin по дате отправления: