Re: Impossible with pl/pgsql?
От | Ramakrishnan Muralidharan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Impossible with pl/pgsql? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 02767D4600E59A4487233B23AEF5C5992A408C@blrmail1.aus.pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Impossible with pl/pgsql? (Markus Bertheau ☭ <twanger@bluetwanger.de>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
Hi, I have tried it on PostgreSQL 8.0.3 and following query gives the result SELECT ( DECORATE( FIND )).* FROM FIND() Regards, R.Muralidharan -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-sql-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-sql-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of twanger@bluetwanger.de Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 8:46 PM To: 'pgsql-sql@postgresql.org' Subject: [SQL] Impossible with pl/pgsql? Hi, I have a function find() that returns a SETOF INT. I further have a function decorate as follows: CREATE TYPE decorate_type AS (id INT, name TEXT, author TEXT, last_change TIMESTAMP); CREATE FUNCTION decorate(INT)RETURNS decorate_typeSTABLELANGUAGE 'plpgsql'AS ' -- BLACK BOX '; Now I can do SELECT decorate(4); (4,egg,john,2003-05-05) and I can do SELECT * FROM decorate(4); id | name | author | last_change --------------------------------4 | egg | john | 2003-05-05 SELECT * FROM decorate(5); id | name | author | last_change --------------------------------5 | ham | dave | 2004-03-01 Let's say find() gives me 4 and 5: SELECT * FROM find(); find ---- 4 5 Now how would a query look like that involves find() and decorate() and returns id | name | author | last_change --------------------------------4 | egg | john | 2003-05-055 | ham | dave | 2004-03-01 I can't figure this out for the life of me. I also have the impression that that's impossible to do without changing find() or decorate(). Markus -- Markus Bertheau ☭ <twanger@bluetwanger.de> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: