Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0221fbf8-faeb-774f-291d-647e3480dfe3@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes (Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/11/22 10:50 PM, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote: > 2022年5月12日(木) 11:46 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>: >> >> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:40:17AM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote: >>> Looking at the release notes from the point of view of someone who has maybe >>> not been following the long-running debate on removing exclusive backups: >>> >>> "Important-sounding backup thing is suddenly gone! What was that >>> again? Hmm, can't >>> find anything in the now-current Pg 15 docs [*], do I need to worry >>> about this!?" >>> >>> [*] the backup section has removed all mention of the word "exclusive" >>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-LOWLEVEL-BASE-BACKUP >>> >>> versus: >>> >>> "Long-deprecated thing is finally gone, ah OK whatever". >>> >>> I am thinking back here to a point in my working life where the >>> release notes were reviewed >>> (by a team including non-Pg specialists) for potential issues when >>> considering a major >>> upgrade - from experience the more clarity with this kind of change >>> the better so >>> as not to unnecessarily raise alarm bells. >> >> Ah, you are right. I thought I had "deprecated" in the text, but I now >> see I did not, and we do have cases where we mention the deprecated >> status in previous release notes, so the new text is: >> >> Remove long-deprecated exclusive backup mode (David Steele, Nathan >> Bossart) > > > That works, thanks! A bit late to this conversation, but +1 from me. -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: