Re: Race condition in recovery?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Race condition in recovery? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 02044f4c-1041-dc97-ded5-c68c362e0e06@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Race condition in recovery? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Race condition in recovery?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/12/21 10:20 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> I have pushed a fix, tested on a replica of fairywren/drongo, > This bit seems a bit random: > > # WAL segment, this is enough to guarantee that the history file was > # archived. > my $archive_wait_query = > - "SELECT '$walfile_to_be_archived' <= last_archived_wal FROM pg_stat_archiver;"; > + "SELECT coalesce('$walfile_to_be_archived' <= last_archived_wal, false) " . > + "FROM pg_stat_archiver"; > $node_standby->poll_query_until('postgres', $archive_wait_query) > or die "Timed out while waiting for WAL segment to be archived"; > my $last_archived_wal_file = $walfile_to_be_archived; > > I wonder whether that is a workaround for the poll_query_until bug > I proposed to fix at [1]. > > regards, tom lane > > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2130215.1623450521%40sss.pgh.pa.us No, it's because I found it annoying and confusing that there was an invisible result when last_archived_wal is null. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: