Re: JSON/SQL: jsonpath: incomprehensible error message
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JSON/SQL: jsonpath: incomprehensible error message |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 01db0c10-a445-15f7-32a5-bdc7c0073179@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: JSON/SQL: jsonpath: incomprehensible error message (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-06-30 Th 04:19, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 6:58 PM Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote: >> Op 29-06-2022 om 15:00 schreef Amit Kapila: >>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 8:46 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: >>>> On 2022-06-26 Su 11:44, Erik Rijkers wrote: >>>>> JSON/SQL jsonpath >>>>> >>>>> For example, a jsonpath string with deliberate typo 'like_regexp' >>>>> (instead of 'like_regex'): >>>>> >>>>> select js >>>>> from (values (jsonb '{}')) as f(js) >>>>> where js @? '$ ? (@ like_regexp "^xxx")'; >>>>> >>>>> ERROR: syntax error, unexpected IDENT_P at or near " " of jsonpath input >>>>> LINE 1: ...s from (values (jsonb '{}')) as f(js) where js @? '$ ? (@ >>>>> li... >>>>> >>>>> Both 'IDENT_P' and 'at or near " "' seem pretty useless. >>>>> >>> removing this. One thing that is not clear to me is why OP sees an >>> acceptable message (ERROR: syntax error, unexpected invalid token at >>> or near "=" of jsonpath input) for a similar query in 14? >> To mention that was perhaps unwise of me because The IDENT_P (or more >> generally, *_P) messages can be provoked on 14 too. >> > Okay, then I think it is better to backpatch this fix. Done. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: