RE: [GENERAL] info on people running postgre
От | Juan Alvarez Ferrando |
---|---|
Тема | RE: [GENERAL] info on people running postgre |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 01be76db$d022a780$1e64a8c0@SG10.suzuki.es обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
RE: [GENERAL] info on people running postgre
RE: [GENERAL] info on people running postgre |
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi, We have tryed PostgreSQL as the backend of a Java application used to collect orders and other information. Everything would have been fine but for the lack of row-level locking, and some problems with processes that go hanged when locked for to long. Also we have experienced a couple of corruptions on a table that suffers the deletion and insertion of 46000 records every day, and some sporadic and misterious backend crashes. Table-locking has forced us to quit from PostgreSQL and move to Oracle. So if you need a read-only (or single user) database with moderate performance (any comercial one is faster), PostgreSQL will probably give you what you need in this other aspects: good SQL, ease of use and administration, really thin JDBC type 4 driver; and you may find to need more of: Export/import tools Backend stability Crash recovery Programming interfaces doc. Best luck, Juan Alvarez Ferrando
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: