Re: Postgresql on multi-core CPU's: is this old news?
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgresql on multi-core CPU's: is this old news? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 01F90FA1-24A2-4135-AFC5-B3E000AF6784@nasby.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgresql on multi-core CPU's: is this old news? (Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Apr 7, 2011, at 1:13 AM, Greg Smith wrote: > On 04/05/2011 02:21 PM, Mischa Sandberg wrote: >> Came across the following in a paper from Oct 2010. Was wondering is this is old news I missed in this group. >> http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/papers/linux:osdi10.pdf >> about Linux optimization on multi-core CPU’s. > > Only a little old; http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/MIT-benchmarks-pgsql-multicore-up-to-48-performance-td3173545.htmlshows most of theobvious comments to be made about it. There is more detail explaining why the hand-waving done in the paper about increasingNUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS is not a simple improvement at http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Lock-partitions-td1952557.html Given that when those tests were done 16 cores was a massive machine, it would probably be a good idea to run them again.If anyone is interested in doing that let me know; we have a 40 core machine that I could probably arrange access to. -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect jim@nasby.net 512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: