[GENERAL] GEQO and KSQO problem.
От | Natalya S. Makushina |
---|---|
Тема | [GENERAL] GEQO and KSQO problem. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 01BEFBB5.E9F284F0@makushina.rtsoft.msk.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-general |
The query plan from your suggestion with regular expression is Unique (cost=318.24 size=0 width=0) -> Sort (cost=318.24 size=0 width=0) -> Hash Join (cost=318.24 size=409 width=292) -> Nested Loop (cost=310.65 size=131 width=268) -> Seq Scan on clients (cost=126.07 size=87 width=256) -> Index Scan using idxsclientidid1 on sotrud (cost=2.12 size=2271 width=12) -> Hash (cost=0.00 size=0 width=0) -> Seq Scan on prinadleg (cost=1.13 size=4 width=24) It's look good, but it's better for our development team to have a simple query with 'OR'. Unfortunely it's not better for Postgres optimizer. ;) May be we try to istall an test Postgres v.6.5.1. Thanks for your help, Natalya. At 16:00 +0200 on 08/09/1999, Natalya S. Makushina wrote: > i tried your query. > This is query plan for select with union clause > NOTICE: QUERY PLAN: >... > I think that it is too slow. > May be optimizer is more intellect in Postgres v.6.5.1? > I use Postgres v.6.4.2. Yes, it's definitely supposed to be better. By the way, if there are not supposed to be overlaps in the queries (that is, a query about one email will never return the same tuple that was returned by a query about another email), you should try UNION ALL. I think it should remove the unique phases. By the way, did you try the suggestion with the regular expression? What was the cost of that? Herouth -- Herouth Maoz, Internet developer. Open University of Israel - Telem project http://telem.openu.ac.il/~herutma
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: