Re: [HACKERS] error messages not only English
От | Andreas Zeugswetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] error messages not only English |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 01BD88DF.3C688810@zeugswettera.user.lan.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Yes, there is a preferred standard, it defines char(5) strings that correspond to specific errors. It is in SQLSTATE in ESQL/C programs and conforms to X/Open and ANSI. It consits of numbers and upper case letters only. The first 2 digits are the Class the, last 3 are the subclass. I think only the Class is in the norm. e.g.: 02000 No data found or End of data reached 00000 Success. 0A000 Feature not supported You get additional info through: exec sql get diagnostics :num_rows_affected = ROW_COUNT [, :num = NUMBER, ...]; The integer SQLCODE + the sqlca structure is from an old ANSI norm: 0 Success 100 end of data < 0 execution not successful > 0 warning Andreas ---------- Von: Vadim Mikheev[SMTP:vadim@krs.ru] Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Mai 1998 18:43 An: Zeugswetter Andreas SARZ Cc: 'hackers@postgresql.org'; 'mimo@interdata.com.pl' Betreff: Re: [HACKERS] error messages not only English Andreas Zeugswetter wrote: > > Anyway, we are still missing the first step in this direction: enumerate ERROR messages. BTW, are error codes in standard ? Vadim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: