Re: sql_implementation_info still contains old value
От | David Johnston |
---|---|
Тема | Re: sql_implementation_info still contains old value |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 018601cdb305$2f2b07d0$8d811770$@yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: sql_implementation_info still contains old value (Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: sql_implementation_info still contains old value
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers- > owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Euler Taveira > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 6:59 PM > To: Erik Rijkers > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] sql_implementation_info still contains old value > > On 25-10-2012 15:36, Erik Rijkers wrote: > > I would expect 9.2.1 to contain '09.02.0001' (not '09.02.0000'). > > > '09.02.0000' is the initdb'ed version. It seems you upgrade binaries from 9.2 > to 9.2.1. > > > It seems we should ignore the last digit or invent a way to update that tuple > according to the new minor version. Another option is document that that > version is the initdb'ed version. > If this is the case does pg_upgrade "init-db" for this purpose? David J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: