Re: Partitioning... -> solved

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Milen Kulev
Тема Re: Partitioning... -> solved
Дата
Msg-id 014601c68fea$fa0c57f0$0a00a8c0@trivadis.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Partitioning...  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
Thanks Tom,
OFFSET is even better solution for me .

Regards. Milen

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 3:57 PM
To: Milen Kulev
Cc: 'Jim C. Nasby'; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Partitioning...


"Milen Kulev" <makulev@gmx.net> writes:
> Thanks Jim, the "trick" worked for me !

>> You might need to add an ORDER BY to the subquery to ensure
>> PostgreSQL doesn't pull it into the main query.

Actually, the usual trick is "OFFSET 0", which works just as well as an optimization fence and doesn't force any
significant extra work. Of course, if you *need* an ORDER BY then that's what to use, but it's overkill if you just
want
to prevent flattening the subquery.

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Relyea, Mike"
Дата:
Сообщение: Out of memory error in 8.1.0 Win32
Следующее
От: Terry Lee Tucker
Дата:
Сообщение: Performance Question