Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol

How feasible is it to break the two drivers separate and put the driver and
code with 6.3 and back under "quarantine".  People can still get it if they
need to, but it is no longer being supported.

I am not sure how much that confuses things.

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: "The Hermit Hacker" <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>; "Dave Page"
<dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>; "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; "PostgreSQL odbc
list" <pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol


> > > Removal seemed to obvious to discuss, I guess, and when I got on OK, I
> > > was on my way.
> >
> > Since you obvious had to have had some sort of discussion and approval
> > (especially after all that you and I have discussed) for the original
> > patch, a similar discussion and approval should have been attained for
> > removing it ... someone had to have liked the original patch to have
given
> > you the go-ahead on it, right?
>
> I am confused.  The Hiroshi point was the <=6.3 compatibility code
> removal.  That was never submitted as a patch.  If you are referring to
> that one, it was added back in the 6.4 days, I guess, but obviously has
> little use now that we are on 7.1.
>
> --
>   Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
>   pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026