Re: Adding new dependencies for in-core
От | Markus KARG |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Adding new dependencies for in-core |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 011501d0b357$26f1eca0$74d5c5e0$@eu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Adding new dependencies for in-core (Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Adding new dependencies for in-core
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Vladimir, sorry for being so ingorant not to give it a deeper thought, but what is in CLHM what is not also in java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap? -Markus -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Vladimir Sitnikov Sent: Dienstag, 30. Juni 2015 14:21 To: List Subject: [JDBC] Adding new dependencies for in-core Hi, I've had a quick look into https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/345 (Share parsed query texts across different connections) and it looks like https://github.com/ben-manes/concurrentlinkedhashmapwould be useful to implement the cache. We don't need all the stuff CLHM has, but I see no easy&scalable way of doing concurrent map with eviction by mere java.util.concurrentstuff. Well, I can do lock splitting (i.e. use multiple small LRU caches instead of a single big cache), however that looks likereinventing the wheel. Can you suggest what is the best way of adding CLHM dependency? Should it be added in plain? Should it be shaded? (i.e. renamed to org.postgresql.clhm...) I'm more inclined to the "add regular dependency" approach. I expect similar question might appear if we consider using netty for IO. -- Regards, Vladimir Sitnikov -- Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: