Re: Performance question (stripped down the problem)
От | GB Clark II |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance question (stripped down the problem) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 01091808024300.35629@prime.vsservices.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Performance question (stripped down the problem) ("Tille, Andreas" <TilleA@rki.de>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tuesday 18 September 2001 07:06, Tille, Andreas wrote: -SNIP- > > echo "SELECT Hauptdaten_Fall.MeldeKategorie, Count(Hauptdaten_Fall.ID) AS > Anz FROM Hauptdaten_Fall WHERE (((Hauptdaten_Fall.IstAktuell)=20)) GROUP BY > Hauptdaten_Fall.MeldeKategorie ORDER BY Hauptdaten_Fall.MeldeKategorie;" | > psql ifsgtest > result > > let i="`date +%s` - $START" > echo "Query took ${i} seconds." >> result > > > (which should just measure the time needed for this task). It took my > E250 (2x400MHz, 2GB) server 20 seconds and this is definitely much to > long for our application. > > Any hints are gratly appreciated > > Andreas. Ok, I tried the query on two boxes: #1 800Mhz duron IDE drives - 11 secs #2 800Mhz P3 SCSI drives - 5.35 secs NOTE: the P3 has alot larger buffers and stuff....(more mem..:)) What does the function plpgsql_call_handler do? Could this be where the slow down is? If it is minor, then how are your buffers and shared mem set? I am by NO means an expert, but I'm quite willing to help if I can. GB -- GB Clark II | Roaming FreeBSD Admin gclarkii@VSServices.COM | General Geek CTHULU for President - Why choose the lesser of two evils?
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: