Re: Postgresql & Python 2
От | Lamar Owen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgresql & Python 2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 01071315043202.00944@lowen.wgcr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgresql & Python 2 (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Friday 13 July 2001 14:47, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Lamar Owen writes: > > But I will reiterate that the prebuilt binary RPMs are built for _stock_ > > RedHat (and hopefully the systems used to build the non-RedHat binaries > > are stock, as well). > Maybe the directory naming on the ftp site should indicate this. For > instance, I see v7.1-Mandrake, that's clear. But what about the rest > (could be the question of a user)? Currently the tree is: /pub/binary/v7.1.2/RPMS/SRPMS /pub/binary/v7.1.2/RPMS/redhat-7.0 /pub/binary/v7.1.2/RPMS/redhat-6.2 /pub/binary/v7.1.2/RPMS/mandrake-8.0 /pub/binary/v7.1.2/RPMS/redhat-7.1 /pub/binary/v7.1.2/RPMS/mandrake-7.2 /pub/binary/v7.1.2/RPMS/mandrake-7.1 Is there improvement yet to be made? Is my structure 'upside-down' (actually, this is the structure Marc started me on.....and I have continued....)? -- Lamar Owen
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: