Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

On Wednesday 27 June 2001 16:51, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I don't think it is healthy to suggest that RH will be releasing their
> own custom modifications to the PostgreSQL core server, unless you know
> something we don't.  :-)

If I did know such, I couldn't tell anybody ;-).   My intent wasn't to
suggest what, on a third reading, my message seems to imply.  Thank you for
catching that for me, Bruce.

> All indications I have heard are that they will be submitting patches
> just like everyone else, and will be working on admin tools too.  Maybe
> that is what you were referring to about a separate license.

That is what I meant, of course -- I just didn't phrase it well.  Patches can
be released with a different license than the code they're patching.

However, I would be surprized if their shipped RHDB product didn't
incorporate changes that they came up with -- even if the PostgreSQL group
didn't apply them to the base dist.  Although I certainly reserve the right
to be wrong.  Yes, I know that may not be healthy.  Yet they do it now with
the Linux kernel (their 'enterprise' kernel patches, for instance) -- why
would PostgreSQL be any different?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11