Re: 7.1.2 packaging
От | Lamar Owen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 7.1.2 packaging |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 01060411075002.00912@lowen.wgcr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 7.1.2 packaging (teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)) |
Ответы |
Re: 7.1.2 packaging
|
Список | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 04 June 2001 10:56, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes: > > On Sunday 03 June 2001 13:05, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > > > "Tim Mickol" <tmickol@combimatrix.com> writes: > > > > any word on 7.1.2 in RPM or SRPM form? > > > An SRPM can be found at http://people.redhat.com/teg/pg/ > > NOTE: > > While Trond's SRPM is very good (and will be used for pieces in the PGDG > > SRPM release), do note that Trond's scripts and spec file both use > > features of latest RedHat releases, which my RPM's may or may not use. > There shouldn't bee much there which is Red Hat specific... > There is comments on the top of the file which break some early > versions of rpm v3 (newer versions of RPM should be run on all > supported versions of Red Hat Linux anyway). Other than that, > reference to Red Hat specific files (like /etc/sysconfig/i18n) are > conditional. In the initscript the use of gettext()? The use of the Red Hat init functions success and kin? (I _know_ some versions of TurboLinux don't support those functions -- yet the RPM will build and run successfully on TurboLinux otherwise.) At one point the spec file wouldn't build to completion on Red Hat 6.1 -- which, at the time, I was supporting, due to the use of a libtool fileset that didn't exist in 6.1. While I know, understand, and agree that you don't need to support older Red Hat releases in the RPMset, I feel rather strongly that the 'generic' RPMset should support as many RPM-based platforms as is possible -- that is, if PostgreSQL builds and runs, then the RPMset should build and run. At least that is my goal -- which means I may very well have cruft in there that the latest RPM fixes -- and I may have to deal with older RPM versions. This is one area our goals differ -- and that's OK. If I still had a development platform running Red Hat 5.2, I'd be making sure that is built there as well. - -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7G6RJ5kGGI8vV9eERAtUQAJ47SI1H+S/uHi2jVpgHmBGnbiU1vwCfZBUO SwV+MfpI+aux+cm960bZA84= =pUZo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: