Re: [GENERAL] Compiling to RPM setup/filesystem layout
От | Lamar Owen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Compiling to RPM setup/filesystem layout |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 01053117044609.00928@lowen.wgcr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Compiling to RPM setup/filesystem layout
|
Список | pgsql-ports |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 31 May 2001 16:22, Steve Wolfe wrote: > something else fills up /var, PG isn't hosed. And if PG fills up it's > partition, other services aren't hosed. Make a partition mounted on /var/lib/pgsql. :-) > Now, play some villanous music, and enter RedHat wearing a black cape, > with small, beedy eyes. They insist that an OS should not touch > /usr/local, and they're right about that. However, if you choose to Linux Standards Base and the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard sets that policy, not Red Hat. And I happen to think it installs to the right place, IMHO. :-) And Red Hat ain't no villain -- unless you're a BSD partisan who thinks Red Hat is responsible for popularizing Linux beyond its worth (that, incidentally, is a friendly dig at scrappy.....) If you like Linux, you should absolutely adore Red Hat -- if nothing else, for payrolling Alan Cox and the stable kernels. > download the Postgres RPM and install it via RPM yourself, they seem to > interpret that as "the OS touching /usr/local", and it won't happen. You > will end up with the binaries in /bin or /usr/bin, the libraries in /lib > or /usr/lib, and the postgres data directory under /var, if I recall. In > short, it spreads things out quite a bit, making it a headache to track > things down. Running rpm -ql on the RPMset is too much of a hassle, right? Removing all traces of the RPMset is easier than removing all traces of a from-source install. > ugly. So, either stick with RPM's, and get RedHat's ideas about where > libraries and binaries should go (and the accompanying mess), or stick to > the source, and get them where the developpers meant them to go, but don't > mix them. Developing a great RDBMS != knowing where to put that RDBMS in the systems context. Sorry. Although, as I _am_ mentioned as a 'Developer' on the globe, and the RPM puts the files where I mean for them to go... well, you decide the worth of that. And followup to the PORTS list, as this is a ports, not a general, issue. - -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7FrHx5kGGI8vV9eERAqQuAKDqga82vmuJukgprQbvV84wnO+OJgCcCWrr hcuKxQvjny3e4V5m0Ky1hy0= =EhNS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления: