Re: adminpack and pg_catalog
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: adminpack and pg_catalog |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 00f801c6f4ee$2d5a25d2$6a01a8c0@valehousing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | adminpack and pg_catalog (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: adminpack and pg_catalog
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----Original Message----- From: "Neil Conway" <neilc@samurai.com> To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net> Cc: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> Sent: 21/10/06 02:03 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] adminpack and pg_catalog On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 22:59 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Nothing except initdb should add objects in pg_catalog. AFAICS, > adminpack doesn't have any special requirements, so it should behave > like all other contrib modules. > Okay. Are there any opinions on whether we should make this change to > contrib/adminpack now (i.e. during the 8.2 beta), later (for 8.3), or not all at? If you change it you will make it useless as pgAdmin won't necessarily find the functions it expects. You might as well justremove it (which will almost certainly cause delays to pgAdmin - and pgInstallers - release as I'll need to find timeto put it all back how it was). Regards, Dave
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: