Re: [PATCH] Add XMLText function (SQL/XML X038)
От | Vik Fearing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Add XMLText function (SQL/XML X038) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 00ec9799-aaa6-9acf-ccad-77bb237a8f8f@postgresfriends.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Add XMLText function (SQL/XML X038) (Jim Jones <jim.jones@uni-muenster.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Add XMLText function (SQL/XML X038)
Re: [PATCH] Add XMLText function (SQL/XML X038) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/25/23 14:42, Jim Jones wrote: > Hi Vik > > Thanks for reviewing my patch! Thank you for writing it! > On 25.08.23 12:05, Vik Fearing wrote: >> I am replying to this email, but my comments are based on the v2 patch. >> >> Thank you for working on this, and I think this is a valuable >> addition. However, I have two issues with it. >> >> 1) There seems to be several spurious blank lines added that I do not >> think are warranted. > > I tried to copy the aesthetics of other functions, but it seems I failed > :) I removed a few blank lines. I hope it's fine now. I am talking specifically about this: @@ -505,6 +506,10 @@ xmlcomment(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) appendStringInfoText(&buf, arg); appendStringInfoString(&buf, "-->"); + + + + PG_RETURN_XML_P(stringinfo_to_xmltype(&buf)); #else NO_XML_SUPPORT(); >> 2) This patch does nothing to address the <XML returning clause> so we >> can't claim to implement X038 without a disclaimer. Upon further >> review, the same is true of XMLCOMMENT() so maybe that is okay for >> this patch, and a more comprehensive patch for our xml features is >> necessary. > > If we decide to not address this point here, I can take a look at it and > work in a separated patch. I do not think this should be addressed in this patch because there are quite a lot of functions that need to handle this. -- Vik Fearing
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: