Re: [INTERFACES] Reply-To: missing
| От | Gregory W Burnham |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] Reply-To: missing |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 00d501bec311$6eda1940$3d063a8e@educ.sfu.ca обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Reply-To: missing ("Ken J. Wright" <ken@ori-ind.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [INTERFACES] Reply-To: missing
|
| Список | pgsql-interfaces |
Does your email client have a 'reply to all' function? That way you'll be replying to the person who wrote the post, and the list. Gregory W Burnham Lead Technologist Excite Simon Fraser University 604 291 3615 (ph) 604 291 5679 (fx) ----- Original Message ----- From: Ken J. Wright <ken@ori-ind.com> To: <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 1999 08:18 AM Subject: [INTERFACES] Reply-To: missing > I could not find on the PostgreSQL web site, who to send this to, so I'll > just start here because at least I won't get bounced. There is no Reply-To: > line in the messages recieved from this list. So just hitting reply in my > mail client will always default To: to the sender of the original message. > Consequently, I have to always remember to change the To: back to the list, > or always cc: the list and know that the original sender is always getting > two messages. Could this be changed? Or is there a good reason that it is, > and should stay this way? This is the only list of many that I s-u-bscribe > (<- without the dashes, this message bounced!) to that has this annoyance > (for me). Anybody else? > > Cheers! > > Ken > >
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: