> > And MS has more enterprise deployments than RH. Does that make MS
> > better than RH?
>
>No, but they aren't a toy either - while they are closed source, and
>trying to force you to their world as much as possible and
restricting
>freedom (like upgrading your machine when running XP) and a
monopolist
>blatantly using their force in the desktop market to increase
adoption
>of new products (hailstorm, IE, original NT server etc), NT isn't
just
>a toy anymore.
Excuse me? When did that happen? What year is it?
Regards.
Gordan