Re: Comparing databases

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ned Lilly
Тема Re: Comparing databases
Дата
Msg-id 00c801c3a914$a7aabb10$ceea1943@Ned
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Comparing databases  (Jussi Mikkola <jussi.mikkola@bonware.com>)
Ответы Re: Comparing databases  (Jussi Mikkola <jussi.mikkola@bonware.com>)
Re: Comparing databases  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Re: Comparing databases  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Comparing databases  (Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>)
Список pgsql-advocacy
> > I thought about both of these points, but didn't really come up with better
> > wording... i think the proper sound bite is that "support companies have come
> > and gone but postgresql continues on"
>
> How about, 'There have been instances in past where companies with postgresql as
> sole core business strategy have failed. but postgresql project continued
> (relatively) unaffected'
>
> Give and take tense and plural/singulars. Talk about weasel wording..:-)

All I'm saying is that from the outside, IMHO, it just creates more problems than it solves.  To use a favorite
metaphorfrom this list, PHB's will read that and smell instability.  I repeat, why volunteer it?  Just say there are
manyfirms providing support today, and it's used at X, Y, and Z companies. 

В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Shridhar Daithankar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Comparing databases
Следующее
От: Jussi Mikkola
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Comparing databases