Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
От | Moray McConnachie |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 00a801bf8363$4645e550$760e01a3@oucs.ox.ac.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
----- Original Message ----- From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; 'pgsql-sql@postgresql.org' <pgsql-sql@postgreSQL.org>; PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 6:18 AM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh > > > So are we willing to field questions from people trying to use TEMP > > > tables and trying TEMP and not TEMPORARY. I realize the restriction on > > > a field called TEMP, but we don't get those very often. How many people > > > are going to guess TEMP and not TEMPORARY? > > > > Well, that's one reason to stick to a published standard. No guessing > > required since one could look it up ;) > > If you survive reading the standard. :-) If you can even *find* the standard :-> (is there an on-line source - all links I've ever seen 404ed...?)
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: