Re: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?

Peter,

Would you like some help on this :) ? Seems
you're fighting a battle alone when theres
no need... I can provide CVS etc. and binary
downloads, if you say the word... the only
problem is that it would be a .com.au domain
name, but I'd make sure I'm not complicit in
any advertising etc... Also :P I'm dying
to get my hands on 7.0 :)

Cheers
Joe

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Mount" <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
To: "'Hakan Tandogan'" <hakan42@gmx.de>; <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 8:39 AM
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?


> The one in CVS is the one that should have been 6.5.3.
> 
> However, I do have at home the one that should be for 7.0. However due
> to problems here (like a network that keeps dying on me, and other nice
> little problems), I've not finished it yet into a state that can be
> included into CVS.
> 
> PS: The org.postgresql change has been done, but not fully tested.
> 
> Peter
> 
> -- 
> Peter Mount
> Enterprise Support
> Maidstone Borough Council
> Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hakan Tandogan [mailto:hakan42@gmx.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 1:28 PM
> To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
> Subject: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Is the version of the JDBC driver I'm getting via CVS really the
> last
> best one? I remember reading on the hackers list that the driver was
> about to
> be repackaged to "org.postgresql", but I don't see this change in the
> CVS
> archive. In fact, the last timestamp change I'm seeing is from 15.
> September.
> 
> 
> Just curious,
> Hakan
> 
> -- 
> Hakan Tandogan                                       hakan@iconsult.com
> 
> ICONSULT Tandogan - Egerer GbR                   Tel.: +49-9131-9047-0
> Memelstrasse 38 - D-91052 Erlangen               Fax.: +49-9131-9047-77
> 
> "Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature"
> 
> ************
> 
> ************
> 
>