Re: read this and puke
От | chris.gamble@CPBINC.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: read this and puke |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 00CA54A79070D411A9E20090273CEF1C14F333@inet1.cpbinc.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | read this and puke (tony <tony@animaproductions.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
I think a big bonus for postgres would be more and better FAQ's. Several issues that I have run into trying to transition myself and my developers from MSSQL and MySQL have only been resolved through hours of usenet searches (at least until I subscribed to the pgsql-general system.) I admit that I may just not know where to find all of the good dirt on postgres, but that is a large part of the problem. Some good questions that I have dealt with since starting postgres: when I run a query comparing a float8 > 3343432, why will it not use the index. The best answer I found is that I have to quote the number (leaving it unquoted the parser complains about some float8 compirson not defined.). case sensitive searches. I have seen the FAQ on this, but for my developers this has been hard to swallow. It has even caused me a great deal of headaches (i need a like search for address, city and state in case insensitive, but to date just deal with only using a UCASE(state) index -- a little on the slow side). This would be useful to have stronger comparisons against other leading db's (i have heard that oracle suffers this problem as well.) This being said, i personally think that postgres is a VERY powerful database solution that I enjoy using.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: